http://www.chris.toph.de/blog/?disp=comments en-US http://backend.userland.com/rss 60 Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:43:26 +0000 Andrew Potter [Visitor] c42@http://www.chris.toph.de/ Now that I've think thought about it some more. The two are not as distinct as a supposed. When PM is prevalent in everyday society one has no choice but to embrace or resist with a possible third option namely "ignore". http://www.chris.toph.de/blog/2009/02/13/should-evangelicals-embrace-or-resist-po#c42 Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:21:13 +0000 Andrew Potter [Visitor] c41@http://www.chris.toph.de/ IMHO your post does not accurately answer the question posed in the title. To embrace postmodernism implies (in my understanding) an acknowledgment of correctness and an adoption of viewpoints within evangelical theology/practice. To resist is to do the opposite.<br /> <br /> To me this is different than a realization that PM has become highly influential in the west and that as Christians we need to be informed about and engage it.
To me this is different than a realization that PM has become highly influential in the west and that as Christians we need to be informed about and engage it.]]> http://www.chris.toph.de/blog/2009/02/13/should-evangelicals-embrace-or-resist-po#c41