Comment from: Andrew Potter [Visitor] Email · http://andypotter.org
***--
IMHO your post does not accurately answer the question posed in the title. To embrace postmodernism implies (in my understanding) an acknowledgment of correctness and an adoption of viewpoints within evangelical theology/practice. To resist is to do the opposite.

To me this is different than a realization that PM has become highly influential in the west and that as Christians we need to be informed about and engage it.
2009-02-13 @ 13:21
Comment from: Andrew Potter [Visitor] · http://andypotter.org
Now that I've think thought about it some more. The two are not as distinct as a supposed. When PM is prevalent in everyday society one has no choice but to embrace or resist with a possible third option namely "ignore".
2009-02-13 @ 13:43

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
PoorExcellent
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
« Ecclesia semper [reformanda]: A plea for the churchA look at emergent ecclesiology »